I Remember from my own days in school...
I was in First Grade...I had homework, basic addition, 100 problems on a page. The teacher said we needed 100 problems because "the more you do, the better you get".
Technically, yes, but actually, no!
I was six years old and I remember crying that night at the kitchen table, it took me two hours to do that worksheet. Worst part about it was, that was a very low-demand, low-value task. One that made me detest math work well into the third grade, where, thanks to a dedicated teacher and a change of heart on my part, math and I made amends.
So what would have been more effective than 100 addition problems? Well, first of all, the word "problem" is problematic. But that was the last post, for this one, I have to rave on about cognitive demand! Why is "more" actually "less"?
Let's introduce the work of Dr. Bloom and company:
This is Bloom's Taxonomy. Most educators are familiar with it. Effectively, Bloom's Taxonomy organizes cognitive demands of certain tasks based on demand level. Higher demand tasks reside at the upper portion of the taxonomy, i.e. "high on the mountain", while lower-demand tasks are towards the bottom. Repetition is a low-demand task. Simply repeating the same thing over and over doesn't make the math more demanding...it just makes the math more nauseating! If we want to make something higher demand, we have to change the mission a bit. Simply scribbling away at basic math isn't going to accomplish much.
Remember those third graders who needed help with subtraction? Those kids liked Pokemon cards. Most teachers consider Pokemon cards to be the bane of their existence, but I saw an opportunity. The third graders wanted to go outside...but we had math to do and a limited time to do it...so I told them we'd have to compromise. We'd go outside...mathematically!
A quick explanation for those who are unfamiliar, every Pokemon card has a few important numbers on it...HP, or Hit Points, are at the top, and are effectively the "health" of the Pokemon on the card. Under the picture of the Pokemon is a list of "moves" or attacks, with a number next to them showing the amount of damage each one does. If you're thinking what I was thinking...
I decided we'd play a math game. Each student was given three Pokemon cards, ones I'd selected ahead of time in the interest of fairness. (Some HP numbers are in the low 200s, others are in the upper double-digits, attacks vary wildly too). Students would count down from three, then they turned their cards over at the same time. They had to read their opponent's HP number, subtract their attack number from it, and get the correct answer. First one to get their answer correct was the winner. I'm fully aware that this is absolutely not how the card game is played, but we're learning math at the age of eight, so it's fine! All of the math was done in sidewalk chalk outside on the blacktop, which only served to make the game more engaging.
This was a higher-cognitive demand task than simply repetitive subtraction within 200. My students had to apply their knowledge of subtraction problem set-up, execute the operation, and all while their opponent was attempting to do the same. Application is higher demand than simply repetition. Plus, we got to play outside with Pokemon cards during school! To elevate this further, if we had time, I would have these students tell me, for each combination of cards, if the Pokemon took turns attacking, which one would win, and how many turns would it take? Now they would have to do two "chains" of alternating subtraction, until they reached zero, all while also keeping track of the number of steps in the chain. Unfortunately, we ran out of time, the weather never cooperated again, and I couldn't bring myself to do Pokemon without the chalk. It didn't feel right!
Obviously, every task cannot be a high-cognitive demand task. However when we're teaching kids we need to be aware that we're not doing them any favors when we fall into the trap of "more is better".
"Better" is better. "More" is only more.
Can you think of another high-cognitive demand math task to use with these students? What makes it higher demand?
References:


